Ms Arash Shuttering Store v. Punjab and Sind Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
No appearance was made on behalf of the applicant. The Presiding Officer dismissed the application in default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/81/2024 IN SA/143/2024
MS ARASH SHUTTERING STORE Vs PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
04.03.2025 Item No.55
Present: None for the Applicant. Ms. Neha Arora, Counsel for respondent bank.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 02:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Ms Arash Shuttering Store
Punjab and Sind Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court