The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur disposed of an application. The court declined to modify an earlier order but permitted the return of Exhibit-18 (pages 6-25 in IA no. 228/2017) in the interest of justice, and disposed of all pending IAs.
Exhibit-18 (page no. 6 to 25 in IA no. 228/2017) to be returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 54
Case No. MA/78/2025 IN
OA/127/2015 BANK OF BARODA Vs MAHENDRA INDUSTRIES
Date: 04.06.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Ayush Kumar Jain, Counsel for the Applicant
In this matter, Counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently in their application they have sought return of exhibit A- 29, whereas it should have been Exhibit A-18 and requests to modify the order dated 21.05.2025.
There is no occasion to modify the order. However in the interest of justice, Exhibit-18 (page no. 6 to 25 in IA no. 228/2017) be returned as per procedure.
Accordingly, MA stands disposed off, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bank of Baroda
Mahendra Industries
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
