Bank of Baroda v. Shanthi Agencies
Case brief
What is this about?
Application allowed condoning 232 days delay in re-presenting recovery OA. Court mandated payment of fees to legal services authority and prompt compliance to proceed.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 232 days condoned. Cost of Rs.1,000 to be paid to Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority before 09.01.2026 and compliance report filed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 19th day of December 2025
Present: SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA Presiding Officer
M.A. No.393 of 2025 in OA Dy. No.4146/2023
Bank of Baroda, Virugambakkam Branch, No.372, First Street, Natesan Nagar, Virugambakkam, Chennai – 600 092 Rep. by its Senior Branch Manager ...Applicant
-Vs-
M/s. Shanthi Agencies, Rep. by its Prop. Senthil Kumar, No.170, kamarajar Salai, Bhaskar Colony, Virugambakkam, Chennai – 600 092
Residence: No.69/7, A-Block, AVM Colony 2nd Cross Street, Virugambakkam, Chennai – 600 092 ….Defendants
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s. S. Vaidyanathan
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 232 days in re-presenting the Original Application for recovery of dues requires condonation of extension of time.
Whether the reasons for delay provided by the applicant bank justify condonation of the belated filing.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bank of Baroda, Virugambakkam Branch
Coram
S.V. Gowramma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court