Dismissed
Rahim Panjwani v. Hdfc Bank Limited
DRTMA/35/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 22.08.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II M.A. No.35 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Prakhar Dixit, Ms Sulekha Punyani and Ms Aditi Mishra i/b M/s. Phoenix legal, Advocates for the Respondent. |
|||
| No representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. |
|||
| nrb – 46 | Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, M.A. No.35 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
State or other Respondent
Coram
AI extract
P.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court