The Tribunal, in an application for condonation of delay, relied on a High Court judgment to allow the applicant bank to re-present an OA for recovery of money. The delay was due to obtaining clean certified copies of documents.
Condonation of delay of 104 days; directions to pay Rs.1,000 cost and file compliance report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 24th day of October 2025
Present: SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA Presiding Officer
M.A. No.307 of 2025 in OA Dy. No.1608/2022
M/s. Union Bank of India, Guindy – SSI Branch Rep. by its Chief Manager, S-10/A, Thiru Vika Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai - 600032 ...Applicant
-Vs-
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s. Ananda Gomathy
ORDER IN MA No. 307/2025
applicant bank for condonation of delay of 104 days in re-presenting the OA.
2
Perused the Affidavit filed on behalf of the Applicant bank
and the records of the case.
V.P. Rajula -Vs.- K.J. Sakadeva Raja reported in LAWS (MAD)-
2020-8-441 feels it apt to condone the delay and give opportunity to applicant to prosecute their case.
3
Sd/-
(S.V. GOWRAMMA) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-III, CHENNAI
(Dictated to Steno (Deepika), transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in Open Court, on this the 24th day of October, 2025)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 104 days in re-presenting the Original Application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act may be condoned?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
V.P. Rajula -Vs.- K.J. Sakadeva RajaRelied on¶21
V.P. Rajula -Vs.- K.J. Sakadeva Raja reported in LAWS (MAD)- 2020-8-441
M/s. Union Bank of India, Guindu – SSI Branch
Mrs. M. Sovmiya Rajakumari
Mrs. V. Ravindran
Mr. D. Senthil kumar
S.V. Gowramma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
