The DRT allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing a Chamber Appeal. The mandate directs the applicant to correct the title of the appeal within 15 days and imposes a fine of Rs.2000.
Application allowed; applicant directed to remove objections within 15 days; cost of Rs.2000 imposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Before Harish Kumar Kaushik, Presiding Officer DRT-II, Mumbai
Order
in Miscellaneous Application No.29 of 2024 In Chamber Appeal (D) No.1985 of 2023 In Original Application (L) No.693 of 2021
M.A. Instituted on: 01.03.2024 Registered on: 21.03.2024 Decided on: 12.03.2025
Union Bank of India
... APPLICANT/s
V/s.
Narayan Forge and Fittings and Anr. ...RESPONDENT/s
Argued By –
Mr Harsh Gutka i/b M/s. Anup Khaitan & Co., Advocate for the Applicant.
None for Respondents.
O R D E R
Page 1 of 3
No.1546 of 2023 on 01.09.2023 which was on the 14th day from the date of declining of the Original Applicant by the Ld. Registrar. It was informed to the Applicant that the title of the Chamber Appeal is incorrect and that they can file amended Chamber Appeal on 04.09.2023. It was argued by the Counsel for Applicant that delay of 2 days was because, that, on 02.09.2023 it was Saturday and on 03.09.2023 was Sunday.
Sd/- (HARISH KUMAR KAUSHIK) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, MUMBAI
Radhika -02
Page 2 of 3
| 12.03.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II M.A. No.29 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Harsh Gutka i/b M/s. Anup Khaitan & Co., Advocate for the Applicant. None for Respondent. |
|||
| Order in M.A. No.29 of 2025 passed separately. Chamber Appeal (D) No.1985 of 2023 be restored in the file after due compliance. |
|||
| rst - 02 | Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay in filing the Chamber Appeal is justified.
Union Bank of India
Narayan Forge and Fittings and Anr
Harish Kumar Kaushik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
