The Tribunal allowed an applicant bank's application for condonation of a 437-day delay in re-presenting an Office Application, citing a High Court judgment, subject to payment of costs and compliance.
Delay of 437 days is condoned subject to payment of Rs.1,000/- to TN State Legal Services Authority and filing a compliance report by 07.10.2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 19th day of September 2025
PRESENT: SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA Presiding Officer
M.A. No.272 of 2025 in OA Dy. No.31/2023
Union Bank of India Adyar Branch L-1, 3rd Avenue Annexe, Indira Nagar, 1st Floor, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020. ...Applicant
-Vs-
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s. V. Siva Kumar
ORDER IN MA No. 272/2025
2
Perused the Affidavit filed on behalf of the Applicant bank
and the records of the case.
V.P. Rajula -Vs.- K.J. Sakadeva Raja reported in LAWS (MAD)-
2020-8-441 feels it apt to condone the delay and give opportunity to applicant to prosecute their case.
3
to comply with the conditional order above, MA stand dismissed automatically without there being any need to pass separate order.
Sd/-
(S.V. GOWRAMMA) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-III, CHENNAI
(Dictated to Steno (Deepika), transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in Open Court, on this the 19th day of September, 2025)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 437 days in re-filing the Office Application should be condoned.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
V.P. Rajula - Vs. - K.J. Sakadeva RajaRelied on¶20
V.P. Rajula - Vs. - K.J. Sakadeva Raja reported in LAWS (MAD)-2020-8-441
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union Bank of India
M/s. Galaxy Enterprises
Mr. R. Nagarathinam
Mrs. P. Usha
S.V. Gowramma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
