Ravi Shankar Kumar v. Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank
DRTMA/24/2024
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| Date of order or proceedin~ |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Orderwith the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| 02.07.2025 | Orderbe uploaded on the Tribunal's website. MA 24 of 2024 Ld. counsel for the respondent is present. None ispresent for the applicant. The present MA has been filed by the applicant to recall the judgment dated 14.07.2023 passed in the OA 643 of 2022. But none is present for the applicant to press thisMA today. I have gone through the MA and heard Id. counsel for the respondent. Inthe aforesaid MA, there is no averment with regards to the non-service of the summons and no explanation why the applicant did not appearinthe OA at the time of hearing of the aforesaid OA. Insuch circumstances, the MA is devoid of merits. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court