This order condones a 361-day delay in re-presenting an Original Application for debt recovery. The court allowed the application subject to the applicant paying costs and filing a compliance report within the stipulated timeframe.
Condonation of delay of 361 days in re-presenting the Original Application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MA 237/24 in OA Dy. No.1679/2022
17.02.2025
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 17th day of February, 2025
Present: SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA Presiding Officer
M.A. No.237 of 2024 in O.A. Dy. No. 1679 of 2022
Bank of Maharashtra
Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Having one of the Branch Office at Shree Gurati Mandal Building 116, Boradway, Chennai – 600 108 ….Petitioner / Applicant
-Vs-
At No.144, Devadarshan Apartment
Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010
MA 237/24 in OA Dy. No.1679/2022
2
17.02.2025
Hosur, Tamilnadu – 635 109
….Respondents / Defendants
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s Shree Law Services
: - ORDER ON MA NO.237/2024- :
Heard the arguments of the applicant’s counsel and perused the records of the case.
MA 237/24 in OA Dy. No.1679/2022
3
17.02.2025
order above, MAs stand dismissed automatically without there being any need to pass separate order.
Sd/(S.V. GOWRAMMA) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-III, CHENNAI
(Dictated to PS, transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me on this the 17th day of February, 2025)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 361 days in re-presenting the Original Application should be condoned.
Whether the present revision application should be allowed with conditions.
Bank of Maharashtra
Star Sands LLP
Mrs. Kiran Bai
Mr. Sushant Agarwal
Mr. Manoj M Kataria
Mr. Subhash Chandran
S.V. Gowramma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
