Dismissed
Ms Anshika Enterprises and others v. Hdfc Bank
DRTMA/202/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Application dismissed due to default because the applicant was not present and lost interest in the matter.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRlBUNAL, PATNA
¶2
| Date of |
Order with the | Office action |
|---|---|---|
| order or |
Signature of the Court | taken with |
| proceeding | date |
¶3
| MA 202 of 2023 | |
|---|---|
| 17.07.2025 | None is present for the parties. Itappears that the applicant has lost |
| interest in the present MA. Hence, dismissed as default due to non- prosecution of the matter. |
|
| Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna V (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer |
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · P.o
- Order 2 — this page · P.o
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court