The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur dismissed an appeal filed to amend the final order by substituting the word 'settle' with 'regularize'. The court held the application was not liable to be allowed.
The application to amend the order to substitute 'settle' with 'regularize' was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 46
Case No.MA/188/2025 IN OA/1206/2024
HDFC BANK Vs AMBALAL GOPAL LAL
Date: 07.11.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms. Vidisha Kaul, Counsel for the Applicant
This is a fresh MA filed for amending & modifying the final order dated 11.07.2025 by substituting the word "settle" with “regularize” wherever it appears in the said order.
The Tribunal is of the opinion that MA is not liable to be allowed. Accordingly, MA stands disposed of as dismissed, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
HDFC BANK
AMBALAL GOPAL LAL
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
