The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the maintenance application as it lacked jurisdiction while the appeal stands stayed before the DRAT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 2
Case No.MA/178/2022
IN
SA/351/2022
TARA RAM Vs SH ASHOK RAMASWAMY DIRECTOR RELIANCE HOME FINANCE LIMITED
Date: 16.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri T S Parmar, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Respondents has approached the Hon’ble DRAT and the orders have been stayed.
This MA is for the compliance of the stay order. Since appeal is pending and the order is stayed, this Tribunal is not competent to permit this MA. Therefore this MA stands disposed of, with the liberty to move appropriate application after Hon’ble DRAT disposes of the matter.
Accordingly, MA stands disposed of, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Tara Ram
Ashok Ramaswamy, Director Reliance Home Finance Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
