Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow dismissed Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 143 of 2022 for non-prosecution and lack of merit. The applicant was unrepresented
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 143 of 2022 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date of order or lroceedin! |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|---|---|---|
| M.A.No.143/2022 17.12.2025 SI No.40 |
None appeared for theapplicant. Ld. Counsel for therespondent- bank ispresent. This MA has beenbroughtbythe applicantforsettingaside/recallofthe judgement dated 02.5.2022passed by this Tribunal in OANo.1402/2018. Itis submitted thatitis ex-parte order ; and when he came to knowregarding order has not been explained inthe MA.Delaycondonationapplication has been filed and it has not been statedthat when he came toknow regardingorder. I find that MA itself is tobe dismissed onbothcounts i.e. fornon- prosecution of the MA as well ason merit, accordinglyMA isdismissed being devoid of merit andnon- prosecutionofthe same aswell. Let the file beconsignedto recordroom Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’swebsite (Dictated) (PravasKumar Singh) PresidingOfficer (Veeresh) |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 143 of 2022 should be allowed, dismissed, or remanded.
Applicant
Respondent-Bank
Pravas Kumar Singh
Veeresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
