The tribunal allowed an application for condonation of a 172-day delay in re-presenting an OA filed by ICICI Bank Limited for recovery, considering the delay resulted from inadvertent mixing of bundles rather than wilfulness.
The application for condonation of delay of 172 days in re-presenting the OA stands allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the, 22nd August 2025
SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA Presiding Officer
M.A. No.136 of 2025 in OA Dy. No.1375/2022
ICICI Bank Limited, West Wing. Plot No. 24, South Phase, Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Chennai-600058. Rep. by J. Vignesh
.... Applicant
-Vs-
Rep by proprietor N Vijay, No. 6/52, Selvavinayagar Koil Street, Near Cementry Road, Washermenpet, Chennai – 600 021.
Also at
Mr. N. Vijay, Flat No. S1, 2nd Floor, Block No C, Sindhu Heaven Apartments, S Kulathur Village, Maxworth Nagar, 22nd Street, S Kulathur, Chennai - 600117.
Also at
Mr. C S. Alfred Prabu, No. 127/3, AmbaNivas, Cox Town, Opp Peter Church, Karnataka, Bengaluru - 560005.
2
Also at
Mr. C S. Alfred Prabu, Old no. 46, New No. 113, Plot No. 10, Rangarajapuram Main Road, Kodambakkam, Chennai- 600 024. ….Defendants
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s. S. Suresh
ORDER IN MA No. 136/2025
3
Sd/-
(S.V. GOWRAMMA) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-III, CHENNAI
(Dictated to Steno (Deepika), transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in Open Court, on this the 22nd day of August, 2025)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 172 days in re-presenting the Original Application should be condoned as inadvertent and not wilful.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ICICI Bank Limited
S. Sarveswaras
N Vijay
Mr. N Vijay
Mr. C S Alfred Prabu
S.V. GOWRAMMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
