Dismissed
Hdfc Bank Ltd. v. Ms Uday Tractors
DRTCA/1/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Chamber Appeal was dismissed in default for non-prosecution as the applicant did not appear and showed no interest in the matter. Pending interim stays were vacated.
What did the court decide?
The Chamber Appeal stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution and interim stay, if any, is vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
¶3
ORDER SHEET
¶4
| 03.09. Sr. No |
2025 .09 CA No. 1/2025 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| CHAMBER APPEAL NO. 1/2025. | ||
| HDFC Bank Ltd., ..Applicant Versus M/s. Uday Tractors and Ors. ..Respondents None for the applicant and respondents 1. In this matter, nobody is appearing to conduct the proceeding for applicant. Earlier also nobody has appeared. 2. Today, also none appeared for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order. ORDER A. The Chamber Appeal No. 1/2025 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. B. Pending IA’s in the proceeding, if any, are disposed of accordingly. The interim Stay, if any also stands vacated. C. File be consigned to the record room. (Dr. J.R. Chauhan) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
¶5
[Ambadas] (CA No. 1/2025) Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
HDFC Bank Ltd.
- respondent
M/s. Uday Tractors and Ors.
Coram
AI extract
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court