Mohan Yadav v. Bank of Baroda

DRT26 Jun 2025APPEAL/9/2025

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

GONTD. ORDER. SHEET

PAGE NO

CASE NO

DATE	DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER	REMARK
	frsq^qreqfrTrfro-+qrara^qr<sfuuq lffi oTrfu-qr,S.erq.O.^qtrqrrN srufisTftf,iq\Mst/zozs
26.06.2025	orftf,refi^qeldft\ *TsuT\rs-f,6 orfuq?mTI sf,<-o-frvaengorfrt
	i. {s^3rTeaTd^g[{3rfi-do1 qYquftq-l'qerm soqsr-{.S.fr.g+erggsd Hsqnrgilxfr-Mftrc af31ftrartrflroT ftqlqqftrqr^qrqutr 2.. rrelqdoesEHccFT{tfuqn orfuoqqgRr Fpffddfuq-+a\d-dYrc erqher.q.es/2012t-f,d.wE-.€)-<Tfr-s-€ fr+6-{^qrEclgq2Grard^q-rdfi q-o.qqfi-qFpfqH-607.06.20i6dBdfuqr qrqxqfrrilfiqqdfr-s-€qgzm:Gyem-a, 22,s8,236/-(Or5CArU3I-drrrqAen<) drffiflvqd)srcrz cfr{-a4ffifi({r<br>rltrnq^qrcord-cqrseifrq+a\ffipTc c{Tfrftrm27.03.2012rl.qqq^q+Fo t3'rdr{ftrnqriofMcrRf,of.d tftR$3trTffi ntrfrrdenBd fril^qdq{si$ orffiERrfrq6 24.06.2016o)flIff orfficrqo-{csTq fuflw+trflHrf,oi.o3.2oi7iftoov, 22,58,236/-(qrrgmg3l-6tct"rrqrrd {nE-ffifl^qq})ercfu{mzt.ot.zotzIe

COilTD. ORDER. SHEET

PAGE NO

CASE NO

DATE	DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER eftQra^qIffifiq{t^qrq9q^erqqq15 ^"
	lt+r{d^{q-qqqflo-GatqflfrT$}
	dil{qkr^qFIqscTFirfi^17.05.2018d qtqqt Mtrc qqro-Gofqmfr ,rd,frtgzotqagmMerq^qrq,qqx -q+Foqqrr-€to.-{iwoqfreTErfltgRI
	,rfi-d 3l]tcrft=irr22.04.2024dmqqrt qq6lr'qfu,furrf,rEufqFrdqofdBf,r
	2'qM qtrfrrd-ditfrtqrrrqrt,oT dft-6srfuq.qsr;S^3TErsTtd^ilqarrt
	Aa&t-sd^qdffi sqfifte^cr+de
	ffrRtso-qfrof^3TBq-oftrqqqvsss. rrrq-ftilTflIfr3TPrf,rfrdwarqo
	futTd^qfrA-fiftql-{^{30.04.202sd ergen}
	lrffi^{qqfu q{}c-i{rcSA-n{q^+frrr
	itqlorc.o3.202sda$tt^fuflHrs-{
	trr4fuR-owtorffi^of'r$t^t
	s o{qrf,r?firrtrfrtdc}.i^o-qm1
	,ilr.cqresdgm^qaerfi-a^qrrl30enq.$.
	ft.'{etggedeTsqT+dffid^u-t1oord
	ES^{Sfl3lk6.-{urgmdRq+aqfreTq}
	i2s/2012dslBdfrltq^{fu{io07.06.2016}
	.n\eTcrrflfrtn^qfiorrgtufu-qi'rqr*^t E+rqfiel$^arEro-rftEnT^{flIfrq-fi-{urt}
	qR-d3nicTfu{i622.04.2022(i{rffio:^ql?rT
	R=Irozz.o+.zoz+)^{o)erurr{fudqriot}
	er$qfuqTTzlTt^qs3TBq.qot
	dr+rq^{q-flfu-aw^ed 3Ttsqf,{d Mfi}
	\q^qr1fr dtrd^ttsFda tio-t

Mohan Yadav versus Bank of Baroda — DRT (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶13

DATE	DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER	REMARK
	efi{ulofE-.{rforffio\serFrflrsiot sTg0rrfr-qrrqrBI
	4. 3lqrf,raff^qHiorfi-dFITFIo1 dfuf,r+frerfta^qrpqrfi+rd^3Tqqiol srftfiarqo€gveffi-anqofuqrtwEfu nrgoeffi-ad^qrrqqtfuse-o"fr^o1 {ftr{r.rT^qrfrTgts-{-dE<dfrtqr^qrd d^gnsrflffi-{q^gnTdRw+a^qftPrc erarff,d.q.Ps/2oi2fidG-f,Frofqfuo 07.06.2016dfr-s-€^q-{gdsiltel^or-qfu sIBaB\qsi$srDrs-rframcIRoetrtcl fuffi22.04.2024dft=d-€^trrtl30^em.S.fr. \r{e^1ee3d^{sffiEu-rgoefra}fi^3rqfu qrflfdBo-r{sofelmr30erx.$.fr.vqe 1ee3rqewt^q6qrqEr'ft-ao-{frtfu qr1frorffismqrftofr;rftfiorrtvrd fut-qzq^qqdrsrfuilrtdvrqerfrBo qfusoft-{fldsiflorfi-dngootnril 3rqrf,rafi^qao)sfud3rr-d-fiererqifu{{UT
	d^qrtqqri^qatrfr-eo-{flenfuGil-tgr krm22.4.2024dfr-dqft-{m06.06.202s
	o)ntgoorfi-dfurrowtvrq-q^qfrEnd 3Tw+riXudvwgi166.otr
	5. erqsrrdr+retfr^qrqr3ogern.O.fr. vEe^iee3ofcrzil-{flrffiqd^qrfrtI
	6. ETm3oqern.Sffyre1ee3d qrqgil-qftqrgr+rit:-

¶17

DATE DESCRIPTION OF THEORDER
[30A.^{Depositofamountofdebtdueforliling} appeal againstordersoftheRecoveryOfficer.- Whereanappeal is preferredagainstany orderofthe RecoveryOfficer,undersection30,byany^person from whom theamountofdebtisduetoabankor financial institutionorconsortiumofbanks^or financialinstitutions,suchappealshallnotbe entertainedbytheTribunalunless such personhas depositedwiththeTribunalfiftypercentofthe amountofdebt dueasdeterminedbytheTribunal.]. 7. sTerfd^qRorfi-dftt{frFf^qBf,d gMlrgf,qfiqrfttftfl{q{3Tff6-{rrgRI ftqfRd^qfiTrilslfrrgr-dFo-Go1 q-dl-{ilfrtilqeih'rqlTuto-t50cfrcrf, fr-ffisdfrrdfr{rersf,^3Tfi-f,Ei^qfi tgilqqrfrEnft^3iarfdelftdof^urqqaT std-dB
8. qaootqmqo-tc{qB,n\ qs 3TB6-{qil{rdBaFpiqfu{io.07.06.2016 deqv+x^qfuqTftuuTo\rrgm,G^ger+-o' 22,58,236/- (el-{gE.-l-ssIedcFIEqI{d rnE-ffi-qsq-i)Td'tr-{^qs$ftvrRr^qq fu{io27.03.2012r\rz^{qftyrdqlffi-63iil{-d} t^qluri"Tqrqvs^qqa{af4-d^qfio1 M^qltudE{tfs-rrmt^qi$Bgffi E€frrdcnBdg3rtftf,-{rdoHr 3rfi-drafffgq^qr<Eft-flrfro-qrdrd qrcqq+Effieteqi,rt,oreltdTfr qtud

DATE
DESCRIPTION OF THEORDER

[30A.^{Depositofamountofdebtdueforliling}
appeal againstordersoftheRecoveryOfficer.-
Whereanappeal is preferredagainstany orderofthe
RecoveryOfficer,undersection30,byany^person
from whom theamountofdebtisduetoabankor
financial institutionorconsortiumofbanks^or
financialinstitutions,suchappealshallnotbe
entertainedbytheTribunalunless such personhas
depositedwiththeTribunalfiftypercentofthe
amountofdebt dueasdeterminedbytheTribunal.].
7.
sTerfd^qRorfi-dftt{frFf^qBf,d
gMlrgf,qfiqrfttftfl{q{3Tff6-{rrgRI
ftqfRd^qfiTrilslfrrgr-dFo-Go1
q-dl-{ilfrtilqeih'rqlTuto-t50cfrcrf,
fr-ffisdfrrdfr{rersf,^3Tfi-f,Ei^qfi
tgilqqrfrEnft^3iarfdelftdof^urqqaT
std-dB

8.
qaootqmqo-tc{qB,n\ qs
3TB6-{qil{rdBaFpiqfu{io.07.06.2016
deqv+x^qfuqTftuuTo\rrgm,G^ger+-o'
22,58,236/- (el-{gE.-l-ssIedcFIEqI{d
rnE-ffi-qsq-i)Td'tr-{^qs$ftvrRr^qq
fu{io27.03.2012r\rz^{qftyrdqlffi-63iil{-d}
t^qluri"Tqrqvs^qqa{af4-d^qfio1
M^qltudE{tfs-rrmt^qi$Bgffi
E€frrdcnBdg3rtftf,-{rdoHr
3rfi-drafffgq^qr<Eft-flrfro-qrdrd
qrcqq+Effieteqi,rt,oreltdTfr
qtud

¶22

DATE	DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER e. 3{k6-{'rAsr{ffsrEro-rfrdam nft-f,fufl!-s+Esfu{i6Q1.03.20i7vs k{rofi.os.2o1ld^ol-5vflYutt q&T tTf,q-{zz,sa,zsa/-^(or5waru^3i-.-drd{ EqR<i {iludrs^{!5c-})gqft=irfr} 27.03.2oi2^q\gqvrRrw^'',,6clo^flffio oiilrrf,t^rt"nr6Y^q-{d-fiqqrsof^qi'l of^q{terqlo^qrr3TBfi-{qrl-{rdft-d trqfu-607.06.2016Vsnfrdffi qEfrrd-edequx zuft catotId-ftq ftqi'R-d{IPrTdq-{zz,sa,z$/-^(qrfl] drsl3i--dlc[qfqx<{tu-fis'sc-n)d qrarETfisIfuq{fuirf,21.03.2012^qqlffi6 3r-fl{rf,trzcfreffi^qrffiocst^q+ttrxot qrqfrtqBt	REMARK
	10.s-qfrsq-$3rffikfl-o-^27.03. zorztTdur{wtq^qrsqrftqfrTorl-l 6-{s6rrfrr^qrTr1+rrtsdfudr€t01 .r$B,fu-gorTePTvqffi r+trfude^ti frnTd ft{qr{€Tt^qrqofIIRT ot-$^.fr
	qErtrqqfurr-uFITo-{ftorf,cthdlt 3rQTff,ufr^qe{o)orfi-d^q-Ef,o-{itg rrr{r3ogeils.s.ft.v{drsggd^qrqqm-ElrT{
	Fr"ifdToE;-c22,58,236/-(qr{irdrs
	or--dr-q=rrqrsdrr\E-ffiqFTd)d.vrrQr erfiac-{goo-rtfu{iorroo1frftn-g{ni rr-uFrTo-{erqolITRTc)-so-<q-atrPr
	o-Tso^qfrYrdoTfidc-{ger6-{iE-g fr-futrfuefu-qr Gr-n3rM^q-dBr

¶35

DATE	DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER
	r-frt^qfuqlfi-dc-{gdEt-iffifrnE oTif6-{urdentur$Trq srTa-ffserrso1 ttfu o)Hfufuafl,edtqr"rvrfrror 50^qfrq-a3rfi-draff^qe{6)^qEITo-FIT srf{qdBI
	14.s-mftqfrdv+reTTfi-{q{ftilq 6<sup>qqrro-€gsfi{tRrdfu-qw-ort'fu ffi qtrfrdedergrmflilmqTf,src 22,s8,236/-(vr6raru3r-dttFlronE) rnE-ffis^qqd)worfi-d^qt1n+k{i6 06.06.2025a-otq^qsof^qrRro-r^rrq-qT u-ooqfrorffi^qlcrwossrftf,reffceT 6)Tf,eri^yqqrqofvtfuoT50cfreTf, 3nTTftrsordfudflderer^qqro-{itE qRrofu-+rurir
	i5.^q6{qEfu-qrsror Bfusrfi-drafr Fr-{rsfirontRrd^qrRrft-Mfueftrd
	qriw3lfr-d5urqlqw gi qd3-g
	3rBo-{qdrrqergi,ilritgqfr-s-€ot qrS r
	16.^qR3rfi-dTaffseTsftrfurtRd ffiqrqE^q3rrtRdvrRr^qqr;r€to-raroq srfuo-qqo\rr-{Ffdfrr}fuflferft-dreff
	grrte-{Edorfi=dql{r30\sT{€}fryfe tggsdurstrnr111-imsuftq-ar^qtrfd+id q-mrrrtft-wflq+rfrqri.ft r
	iz. q-q-frsTErf,rftorerffiserftra Ck=O{{laldc<DIEI^qFm]fi-flqlq I

Mohan Yadav v. Bank of Baroda

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Global Properties through its Partners Mr Arvind Agarwal and Mr Ayush Agarwal versus Assets Care

Smt Sultana Bee versus Canara Bank

Abdul Ajeez Khan Now Deceased versus Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd.

Ms G T Homes versus Central Bank of India

Mohan Yadav v. Bank of Baroda

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Global Properties through its Partners Mr Arvind Agarwal and Mr Ayush Agarwal versus Assets Care

Smt Sultana Bee versus Canara Bank

Abdul Ajeez Khan Now Deceased versus Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd.

Ms G T Homes versus Central Bank of India

Mrs Madhubala Awasthi Wife of Shri Khemraj versus Uco Bank

Suneel Jain versus Bandhan Bank Limited