Bank of Baroda v. M/S Acme Paper Ltd.
DRTAPPEAL/16/2024
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
¶2
PAGE NO
¶3
CASE NO
¶4
| DATE REMARK DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER .q.rc/2024 |
|---|
| 04.06. 25 trqeff?n-qio'1d ftq+ft slqctIdqBq-mr t e-.q?ff@-qifr2 Ys 3dfr\fr t-fi{f,rslBqffirt errue-o-{qoltdquttrTtgfrTdtt yaro'froifrqorrerTftqqrqlI .liftqoil-eYrqrRofu-qt.rqrt ilq1$lt dqrl{]rt orfi-drrfrqttrntd-c t-+'otrsq-dqrgMq-r5d3ffi-d eqlFra ffi gqq{frorffioqrfr2sRI sTtq*i terqrwfrqrrrqrt ffi ddTsH qrqgssffH-ffq-f,IqlmgRrtr{gd @qifi20/2024sqTFrdq-o-{{fifiIq qrqxe-q-frqffi@ql-fizgfrffi 6Rrqqfrtrfi-wrfr.q.{.gtroa/ zoo.s qrRdsnfrkoqTtrTfu{lo'18.10.2024 qrEz-qtf,rfrqatq-qd-fiq.,B1frftv+ o1-l{qqqr\tiqR-o'T"rqTdentm furfRna1.r{qqa-fiqgdvrRTot zazsezto.zstt(dot-scqnfraro sorsdd<tior1s<rfttfr)ZEWf oTqi-dretrqsdftrgfriTdsr erfu+mt entcrfu{ifi18.10.2024ap:il-FffigsfrB EMrqfrdsT4sqerffiott qi c-dT5e-R |
¶5
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
¶6
PAGE NO
¶7
CASE NO
¶8
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER |
|---|---|
| ofT$r-unrSi 3TTIIFT +ffit-no<sup>q+rtrEd-cte{fi gsqgffi-a:ftqiE3o.oo2o24o1fuTfr 3zos61ss2/-(q-ffi-flm}-sqfuqETTcI aqnfr-qqietq-{)vu-ivqdqriot troTfi-d@-qj6zo/zoz+qqFldqrS \rTrcr(qqfrqffi E-qio2gl{Iqrtrd 3rretrfu{rf,18810.2024dsqelovqfr-E gMpTddEWfqqsrffioriqtqIRd GrrtrrEi-iterqrwo1qroso-tre-or-+ed q-gqRoifrqoiltrTqrR-ofoqrrq t orrtYrqfrqfrsrrrsHa)sq6e1 @{rSqd I qRunqqde)t oTmq GTffisrrxqgsld(rsrqrit (iTqfrqrsq- |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court