One Judge, Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Delhi dismissed an application for transfer after allowing the applicant bank to withdraw it due to an amicable settlement and closure of the borrower's loan account.
IA no.35 is allowed; TAl82812024 is dismissed as withdrawn; court fee to be refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il,Delhi
TA/82812024 YES BANK VS REKHACHANDERBHAN & ANR
28.08.2024
Item no. 98
Present: Ms. SoniaRawat, Counselfor applicantbank
Matter is taken throughVideo Conferencing/Hybridmode.
IA no.35ggl2O24has been filed by the applicant bank for withdrawal of the PresentTA.
The Ld. Counsel for theapplicant bank- submits that the matter has been settledand the loari account of the defendants has beenclosed accordingly.Therefore, the applicant bank seeks towithdraw the present transfer application, as settled.She further submits that she also prayed for refund of the couft fee.
In view of above submission,IA no.3599 12024is allowed. TAl828l2O24is dismissedas withdrawn, being amicably settled.Registry is directedto return the couft fee as Perrules.
File be consigned torecord room.
9)t Z (susHIL KUMAR d\SroGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
c
YES BANK
REKHA CHANDERBHAN & ANR
SUSIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
