The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application for default due to the non-appearance of the applicant bank, holding it no longer interested in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TAl76Ll2024
UNION BANK OF INDIA VS JAI BHAGWAN AND ANR
27.08.2024
Item no. 19
Present: None.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl Hybrid Mode.
Despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant bank. It appears that the applicant bank is not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present TA is dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
File be consigned to records.
d[, (susHIL KUMnx TIASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
UNION BANK OF INDIA
JAI BHAGWAN AND ANR
SUSHiL KUMAR TIWASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
