The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant bank's application for default due to lack of prosecution, citing the applicant's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Application dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecoveryTribunal-Il, Delhi
TAls6l2022 UNIoNBANKoFINDIAVsTAUSEEFAHMAD Z331.ZOZ4 Item no'08no'08
Item no'08no'08
Present:None
Matteris taken through video conferencing/ Hybrid Mode.
None appearedon behalfof the applicant.bank.None appeared today. Itappears that the applic'aht B-r!.is. not interested in pursuing thecase. Hence, the present TA is dismissed in default for non-Prosecution.
File be consignedto records'
e_'. (susHIL KUMARRASToGI) PRESIDINGOFFICER DRT-II,Delhi
c
Union Bank of India
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
