Disposed
Bank of Baroda v. Anubhav
DRTTA/447/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 29/01/2024 | Ex. No. Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in TA 447 of 2023 Bank of Baroda Vs Anubhav Aggarwal |
Next date |
|---|---|---|
| Advocate Nilesh Bamne i/b M/s. A.R. Bamne & Co. appeared for the Applicant. Advocate Sankalp Shrivastav i/b Advocate Anirudh P. appeared for the Defendant no. 1, 2 & 3. By way of the Pursis, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant inform that NCLT proceeding is pending against all the contesting Defendants i.e. Defendant no. 1 to 3 therefore, the matter may be kept in sine-die. Looking to the facts that NCLT proceeding is initiated qua the contesting the Defendant no. 1 to 3 thus moratorium and interim moratorium shall prevail on the present proceeding, thus, there is no substance to continue the present proceeding and therefore, present proceeding is hereby disposed off with liberty to the Applicant to revive the same as and when required. File be closed and consigned to record room. P.O. DRT-I |
¶2
Sgj/-47
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Anubhav Aggarwal
Coram
AI extract
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court