Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application for non-prosecution as the applicant bank did not appear on multiple dates or the day of hearing, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the case.
The application was dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TAl43312024 STATE BANK OF INDIA VS SH. SANJAY SHARMA
27.08.2024
Item no. 18
Present: None.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/ Hybrid Mode.
On perusal of the file it is obserued that none appeared on behalf of applicant bank on 09. t2.2022, tL.02.2023 and t9.07 .2024. Today also none appeared on behalf of the applicant bank. It appears the applicant bank is not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present TA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
$'z
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
STATE BANK OF INDIA
SH. SANJAY SHARMA
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
