The Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of an application by the applicant bank due to inability to trace attachable assets and the bank's wish not to pursue the matter further.
Withdrawal of the application allowed; the pending application dismissed as withdrawn and all pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovety Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TAl2O9l2023
ICICI BANK LIMITED Vs SH KASHI NATH TIWARI AND oRs 5.09.2024 Item no. 69no. 6969
Item no. 69no. 6969
t Present Sh. Satish Kumar, Counsel for applicant bank ! i Sh. Sagar Thakkar, Counse! for Resolution I I Professional of defendant no.3 (ex-parte dated 06.02.2023
Defendant no.l & 2 are ex-parte dated 06.02.2023
is taken through Video Conferencingl Hybrid Mode.
[A Iwithdrawal ofno.4098/2024 the presenthas been TA. filed by the applicant bank for
The Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that despite best possible efforts, the applicant bank has been unable to trace the attachable assets of the defendants and is unable to dues standing in the Loan account at this stage.
IlThat Idue to the above reasons, the applicant bank does not wish Itopursue the present matter any further. He fufther submitsthat lhe wish to withdraw the present TA.
In view of the above submission made by the ld. counse! for applicant bank, IA no. 409812024 is allowed. TAl209lZ023 is dismissed as withdrawn. Al! the pending IAs stand disposed of.
File be consigned to record room.
g\ (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICE& DRT-II, Delhi
c
ICICI BANK LIMITED
SH KASHI NATH TIWARI
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
