Dismissed
State Bank of India v. Madhusudan Process & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
DRTTA/1683/2026
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL-3,KOLKATA Order Sheet(Continuation)
| caser.lo.rllz | orzlzors State sankofhdiavs.Namita Sar |
kar& Ors. |
|---|---|---|
| Orderwithsignature | Office action withdateand dated Signature ofpartieswhen |
|
| OrderNo.22 Dt.o7.o5.2024 Sl.No.40 |
RecordisputuptodayfromRegistrar Bench' Noneappearsfromeitherofthesides' Itappearsthatthecasewasfiledon18'092007 andsincethentheapplicantbankisnotexhibiting anythingpositivetopursuethecase.Theapplicant bank hasnottakenany stepintermsoftheorder No.8dated 05.05.2009'Service is alsonotcompleted uponthedefendants'The applicant hasnotproduced documentsforverification. Positionofthecaserecordshowsthatthecasehas lamentabtybeen hangingon firefordisposalsince pettylongtime. Itappearsthat theapplicantbanklsexhibiting completelackadaisicalattitudetoproceedwiththe case. Eventodaynoneappearsonbehalfofthe applicantbank. Onperusalofcase record,itappearsthatthe applicantbankisnot willingtoproceedwiththecase. Hence, ordered TAbeingNo.2102of2015isthusdismissedfornon prosecutionandalsofornoncomplianceoftheorder ofthis Tribunal. (KAMAL PRESIDINGOFFICER DRT-III,KOLKATA |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether DRTP should dismiss the recovery proceeding for lack of prosecution due to the applicant bank's inaction.
State Bank of India
Namita Sar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court