The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application by ICICI Bank as withdrawn. The bank failed to trace defendants or attachable assets and chose not to proceed further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribuna!-Il, Delhi
TAlL4O4l2022 ICIfi BANK LIMITED VS FAISALARIF
27.08.2024
Item no. 14
Present Shri Satish Kumar, counse!for applicant bank.
None for defendants.
Matter is taken through VideoConferencingl Hybrid Mode.
TA 4. In view of theabove submission, no.14o4 12022 isdismissed as withdrawn' IA drY, no.3633 12024alongwith pendingIAs, if disposed of accordinglY.
File be consigned torecordroom.
$,.
(SUSHIL KUMAK RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
TALL4O4l2022 ICIfi BANK LIMITED
FAISAL<sup>ARIF</sup>
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
