The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in default for non-prosecution as neither party appeared and the appellant bank was found uninterested in pursuing the matter despite a default notice.
The present TA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TA/ 13841 2022 PUNJAB AND SIND BANK Vs SMT. AMRESHWATI
23,09.2024
Item no. 36
Present: None.
Matter is taken through video conferen cingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. counsel for both the parties are not appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite issuance of default notice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant bank. It appears that the applicant bank is not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present TA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
Sa_ (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Punjab and Sind Bank
Smt. Amreshwati
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
