Canara Bank v. Krishnamurthy
Case brief
What is this about?
DRT-III, Chennai disposed of a reopened application regarding banking recovery by accepting that the claim was settled out of court via OTS without costs.
What did the court decide?
OA disposed of as settled out of Court without costs; registry directed to return documents and applicant to apply for court fee refund.
What the court decided
1
T.A. No. 1098 of 2023
09.02.2024
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 09th day of February, 2024
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K. Presiding Officer
TRANSFERRED APPLICATION No. 1098 of 2023
(Originally filed before DRT- II, Chennai as OA 113/2020 and thereafter transferred to this Tribunal and renumbered as TA No 1098 of 2023)
M/s .Canara Bank Nandanam Branch, 331, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. ….Applicant
-Vs-
Mr. Krishnamurthy S/o. Mr. V. Ramachandran Proprietor of M/s. Aarudra Electrical Engineers, (as Proprietor and as Individual) D12, Labour Colony, Thiru Vee Ka Industrial Estate Guindy , Chennai-600 032 …..Defendant
Parties & counsel
- applicant
M/s .Canara Bank Nandanam Branch
- respondent
Mr. Krishnamurthy S/o. Mr. V. Ramachandran
Coram
Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court