The applicant sought withdrawal of a Stay Application (SA). The court accepted that the loan account was settled and the SA became infructuous, disposing of the SA as withdrawn.
Stay Application was disposed of as withdrawn following settlement of the loan account.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
coNTD. ORDER-SH EET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DES RI c PTtoNo T F E H oRDER |
REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA985t22 27t03/24 |
Appticantby ShriUmeshTripathi,Advocate Respondent No.-1 byShriAdityaNayak, Advocate NoneforRespondent No.-2to4 |
|
| CounselforAppticant hasfited anapplication for withdrawalofSA supportedwithaffidavitofShri Deepak Kumar Vyas,Applicant,on07102124.ltis statedthatAppticanthassettled hisaccountwith MentorHomLoanslndiaLimited andthepresentSA becomeinfructuous. TheCounselfortheAppticant- bankfurtherpraysfor withdrawal of thepresentSA. |
||
| ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheAppticantandthe submissionmadebytheCounselforAppticantthat theAppticanthassettted his loanaccountandhas madeful[andfinatloan amountto theRespondent, thepresentSAstandsdisposedofaswithdrawn. Record be consignedto therecordroom. (Ram atet) Presidingofficer |
Applicant
Mentor Home Loans India Limited
Respondent No.-2
Respondent No.-3
Respondent No.-4
Ramayat
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
