Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata dismissed the appeal filed by the applicants against the respondent bank for failure to appear.
SA/929/2022 is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-3, KOLKATA Order Sheet (Continuation)
Case No. SA/929l2022 Debabrata Mukherjee & Anr. Vs. punjab National Bank Office action Date of Order with signature with date and dated Signature Order of parties when
ordcrxa-13 Dt.11.12.2024 Sl.No.08
SA|929|2OZZ is taken up for further hearing. Heard learned counsel for respondent bank. Considered.
Ld counsel for respondent bank submitsthat the matter is settled with thebank and the SA applicant haspaid the entireloan amount and the SA applicant will not turn up topursue the matter'
Under such circumstances,since none appearsfrom the side of the SAapplicant,I think that it is futile to drag the case anyfurther. Hence, Ordered
SA/929/2022is dismissedfor default.
(KAMAL DE) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-III, KOLKATA
Debabrata Mukherjee & Anr.
punjab National Bank
KAMAL DE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
