Dismissed
Naveen Sharma v. Axis Bank
DRTSA/827/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Matter dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the Applicant.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶2
PAGE No.
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA827122 22t03124 |
NonefortheApplicant ShriAdamiaBajpai.Advfirrthe l{esponderrt OnmatterbeingtakenRespondent Counselb invitingattentiononorderdatedl\10312 apprisedthatonearlierdatealsonooneha appeared onbehalfofApPlicant. |
|
| Onperusaloforder datedIll03l24itrevea thatonlastdateofhearingalsonooneh appearedeven thenl.natterhadbeenadjorrrrl withperemptoryorderthen alsonoo appearedtoday. S |
||
| Itlooks nou' Applicants havinguointcrcst prosecutethisrnattet'lIrther. o |
||
| Therefore matterisbeingdismissedforwa ofprosecution. 1 |
||
| Recordbeconsignedtothe record room. (llanrNiuasI'ltel) Presiding0lficer D.R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&C.G) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
HanraamivasMalwa
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court