Application disposed of without further time for instructions after settlement and full payment by applicant. Matter closed.
Further time for instructions refused; application disposed with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 09/01/2024 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in SA 75 of 2023 M S Prabhu Construction and Ors Vs Canara Bank |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate for the Applicant present. Advocate Kushal Sawant and Advocate Umar F. Azam appeared for the Respondent bank. Today again, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant seeking further time for taking instructions regarding the delay period interest. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent submits that after the settlement in the present matter now nothing survives in the present matter. Looking to the facts that matter is already settled between the parties and the Applicant has paid entire settlement amount. Ld. Counsel for the Applicant seeks time for taking instructions for the delay period interest which was earlier was allowed. Therefore, I do not find any case to grant further time for taking instructions in the present matter and thus present SA is disposed off with liberty. |
|||
| File be closed and consigned to record room. | |||
P.O. DRT-I |
Sgj/-37
M S Prabhu Construction and Ors
Canara Bank
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
