Disposal of a stay application as withdrawn by the applicant. The dispute underlying the stay application was amicably settled, and the applicant deposited dues leading to the closure of the loan account by the respondent bank.
Withdrawal of the stay application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD.ORDE R-S HEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTTON OFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA727t23 12t07.124 |
Appticantby Shri PrakharTiwari,Advocate Respondent-Bank byShri AshishDixit,Advocate |
|
| Counselforthe Applicanthasfitedanappticationfor withdrawalon12/02124 supportedwithAffidavitof Smt.TriveniMehra, Appticant No.-2,forwithdrawal ofSA.ltisstatedthattheAppticanthasfiledthe presentSAassaitingtheactionofthebankinitiated undertheprovisionsofSecuritisationAct. ltis furtherstatedthatduringthependencyoftheSA dispute betweentheAppticantsandDefendantswas amicabtysetttedandtheApplicantshaddepositedan amountofRs.8,24,561/-andtheBank hadctosedthe loanaccounton06101124.TheCounsetfor Appticantsfurtherpraysfor withdrawal of thepresent sA. |
||
| Consideringthe affidavitoftheAppticant No.-3and thesubmissionmadebytheCounsetforAppticant thattheAppticanthasdeposited and amountofRs. 8,24,561l-towardsfut[andfinalsetttementofthe dues,thepresentSAstandsdisposedofaswithdrawn. Record be consignedto therecordroom. asPate[) Presidingofficer |
Applicant
Bank
Presiding officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
