The single judge permitted the withdrawal of a service arbitration application on the ground that the dispute had been settled amicably and the applicant's account closed by the respondents.
The SA is disposed of with withdrawal to be unconditional.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA70u22 24t0y24 |
ShriPushpendraTiwari,AdvfortheApplican NonefortheRespondent |
|
| Onmatterbeingtaken ApplicantCounse apprisedthatloandisputehas alreadybeer settledamicablyand accountofApplicantha also been closed. |
||
| ApplicantCounselfurtherbyinvitingartenrior] onclosure reporttaggedwithapplicationfbl withdrawaland prayslibertytowithdrarv thij SA unconditional. Looking toapplicationandoralsubmissio,ro] Applicantsideisrevealsthatdisputehas alreadybeensettlednoneedtoprosecute thir SA further. |
||
| Applicantisperrnittedtowithdraw thisSA. SAisdisposedo1-nswithdrau,n. |
||
| Recordbeconsignedtotherecord room. (Itarn iwasI'atel) PresidineOfficer D.R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&C.G) |
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No...
CASE No..
| DATE DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER |
REMARK |
|---|
Applicant
Respondent
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
