In an interim appeal (SA) regarding accounts or notices against an applicant, the presiding officer held the matter infructuous after the respondent bank established the loan account was settled. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed as no further action was required.
The single appeal/application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No.........
CASE No.......
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE OROER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA691/23 12t04124 |
ShriShreyasDubey,AdvfortheApplicants ShriAdamya Bajpai,Advforthe Respondent Onmatter being takenRespondentCoun apprisedthatloanaccountofApplicantsh alreadybeensettledandaccountis closed. ApplicantCounsel submits thatApplicanth orallyintimatedhimasinformedby Respondent-BankloanaccountofApplican hasbeen settled. S |
|
| ApplicantCounselfurthersubmitsthatS maybedisposedofasperinformation Respondent-Bank. f |
||
| SinceApplicantshavenotchallengedt submissionofRespondent-Bankitrevealsth accountofApplicantshasbeen settledand needtoprosecutethisSAfurther. t o |
||
| Thereforetakingintoconsiderationo submissionofboth thesidethisSA isbei disposedofasinfrutous. Recordbeconsignedtothe record room. (Ram I as Patel) PresidingOfficer DRT:JABALPUR (M.P.&C.G.) I (, |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's loan accounts had been already settled by the Respondent Bank, rendering further prosecution of the appeal infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicants SH
Respondent Bank
Ram Jas Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
