This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order Sheet
| Case No. SA 68 of 2022 |
DIGANTA BANERJEE AND ANR -VS- RELIANCE HOME FINANCE LTD |
|---|---|
| Dat e of the Ord er |
Order with Signature O f f i c e a c t i o n w i t h d a t e a n d d a t e d S i g n a t u r e o f P a r t i e s w h e n n e c e s s a r y |
1
| 1 0 . 6 . 2 024 ( S l . N o . 34) |
Mr. Avishek Guha, Ms. Akansha Chopra, Ms. Ritika Pal. … For the Respondents. |
|---|---|
| None appears for the sarfaesi applicants. | |
| The respondent finance company has filed affidavit-in-opposition to SA. |
|
| Learned counsel for the respondent finance company submits that the applicant has challenged the possession notice dated 19.11.2021 for non-compliance of Rule 8(1) and 8(2) and also to set aside the demand notice issued under Section 13(2) with some interim reliefs. |
|
| Learned counsel for the respondent finance company referring to their affidavit-in-opposition submits that possession notice has been served to the borrower and have complied with Rule 8(1) & 8(2) and also served demand notice. |
2
As the sarfaesi applicant is not present for hearing of the SA, the SA is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Ambuja Mohan
Das) Officer
P r e s i d i n g
ac
3
Diganta Banerjee and Anr
Reliance Home Finance Ltd
Ambuja P. Mohan
Das
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court