In a securitisation application, the applicant alleged settlement of dues and withdrawal of the original application. The tribunal disposed of the matter as settled.
The Securitisation Application No.66/2022 is disposed of as settled. All pending IAs and interim orders are disposed of or vacated accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
25.04.2024
| S | r. No. | Supp 01 S.A No. 66/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No. 66/2022 Eknath Budha Patil .. Applicant Versus Bank of Baroda .. Respondents Mr. Patil Shrikant - Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A.A.Mishra – Advocate for respondent 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire settlement amount has been deposited by the applicant and the bank has given no dues certificate. He requests for disposal of the matter. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the bank has also withdrawn the Original Application no. 380/2022. 3. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant, I pass the following order :. ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.66/2022 is disposed of as settled. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. Interim orders if any also stands vacated. C. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK]
Eknath Budha Patil
Bank of Baroda
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
