The Delhi High Court application was withdrawn by the applicant's counsel, citing the outcome of a related case (SA No. 82/2022). The application was accordingly dismissed in closed court.
Student timetable
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/62/2022 CHARAN SINGH Vs
CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD
18.01.2024 Item No.78
Present: Sh. Akhilesh Vyas & Sh.Vikas Bali, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.Shashank Pathak, Counsel for respondent FI (on VC).
Mr.Vyas, counsel for the applicant states that another case bearing No. SA No.82/2022, titled Amarjit Singh Sohal Vs. CFM Asset Reconstruction Private Limited, is fixed up for today, which has been disposed of by this Tribunal.
Mr.Vyas, counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar that in view of the order passed in SA No.82/2022, titled Amarjit Singh Sohal Vs. CFM Asset Reconstruction Private Limited, he does not want to pursue the present SA. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
Manoj
Charan Singh
CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt Ltd
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
