Single Sar issued by DT Jalpur allowing challenge to auction notices scheduled on 19.06.2022 and 20.07.2022 as they became infructuous due to failure of auctions for want of bids on those dates.
Application dismissed as infructuous as auctions failed due to want of bids; liberty granted to file fresh SAR challenging future action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No.
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA609122 14t02t24 |
ShriSaleemRahman,AdvfortheApplicants ShriAshishDixit,AdvfortheRespondent l.Matteristakenu No.983/24application scheduledon14102124. hearingonlA stayingauction p for for 2.On matter being takenRespondentCounsel apprisedthatinpursuanttoauctionnotice dated25101124awtionscheduledtodaycoulc not getmaterializedforwantofbid. 3.OnperusalofreliefclauseofthisSAit revealsthatApplicant haschallengedtht auctionprocess publishedon19106122 scheduling auctionon20107 122. 4.BeingqueriedRespondentCounselapprisec that earlier auctionscheduled on20107122hac alsonotgotmaterialized. 5.Lookingtosolitaryreliefclaimedbytht Applicantstosettingasidetheauctionnotict dated19106122auction scheduledon20107121 whichhasalreadygotinfrustousaquer) raisedtotheApplicantCounselhowthis SAir maintainabletohearon merit. 6.ApplicantCounselbyinvitingattentiona Para-S.8ofSAsubmitsthatearliertht Applicants havefiledSANo.135/15whicl dismissedon2l106l16 forwantofprosecutior forrestoringthesamemiscellaneout applicationno.65/16wasfiledhowevertha alsodismissedforwantofprosecutionot 24108118thereafteranother iscellaneour |
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No.
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| applicationfiled on18107122howeverdueto sometechnicalissuetheMAcouldnotgot registeredand applicationisstilllyingwith registry. |
||
| 7,ApplicantCounselfurtherbyinviting attention onletterdated19107122issuedbythe registrarofthisTribunalsubmitsthatfornf faultoftheApplicantsthemiscellaneout applicationforrestorationofdismisse{ miscellaneousapplicationaswellasSAye! notgotregistered thereforeasperadvicegive( byregistrarthisseparateSAhasbeenfiledtc challengetheauctionnotice dated19106122 andauctionscheduledon20107122. 8.ApplicantCounselfurther pral'sforkep pendingthisSA todecideonmerit. 9.Afterhearingthe ApplicantCounselanc perusalofpleadingsofApplicantitreveals thatearlierSANo.l35/15 hadbeenfilec challenging thedemandnotice dated04103113 andpossessionnoticedated21107115whict SAhasalready been dismissedforwantol prosecutionandapplicationforrestoratior MANo.65/16hasalsobeendisrnissedlor wantofappearanceofApplicantsidethatistc sayno SAchallengingthepossessionnotice yetrestored. 10.Sofar this SAisconcernedforwhicl reliefthis SAis filedhas becomeinfrustout sinceinpursuanttosalenoticeundel challengeddatedl9106122auctionschedulec on20107122hasalreadybeenfailed. |
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No..........
CASE No.
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| ll.Sincenootherreliefisclaimedthroug! thisSA nocauseofactionissurvivetokeef thismatterpendingforhearing on merit. 12.Sofarinpursuanttoauction noticedatei 25101124auctionscheduledon14102124i: concernedwantofbidauctionhasalreadl beenfailedasintimatedbytheResponden Counsel. 13.Thuslookingtoabovecircumstanceso. caseinopinionofthisBenchthisSAhar become infrustous. 14.IthereforedismissedthisSAasbecome infrustousgivinglibertytothe Applicantstc challengefutureactionoftheRespondent. Bankfilinglresh SA. 15.It ismadeclearthatwhenever miscellaneousapplicationfiledbythe Applicanttorestorethemiscellaneous application no.65/16dismissedforwantol prosecutionandSA No.l35/15 wouldcome beforetheBenchforhearingallteclinical faultsonwhichreasonmiscellaneous applicationforrestorationcouldnotbegot registeredalsoshallbeconsidered. 16.Withthisobservationthis SAisherebv dismissedasinfrusouts. 17.Record beconsignedtotherecordroom. atel) Presi Officer o D.R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&C.G) |
Applicant
Respondent
Presi
Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
