Single judge order dismissing the Special Appeal for want of prosecution as neither party appeared on the hearing date.
Dismissal of Special Appeal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No.....
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA570122 02t07124 |
NonefortheApplicant ShriRitieshKushwaha,Adv forth, Respondent |
|
| OnmatterbeingtakenRespondentCounse invitingattentiononorder dated1610512, submitsthat onlastdateofhearingalsoflooll hadappearedhoweverpassingperemptor order matterhad beenadjourned. Perusaloforder dated16105124itrevealstha onlastdateofhearingRespondentCounse hadapprisedtheBenchthataccountofthj Applicanthasalreadybeensettledhowevel lookingtosummervacation matter hadbee{ adjournedfortoday. I Sincetodayalsonooneappearedonbehalfol ApplicantandRespondentCounselhui already apprisedtheBenchthataccountofthi Applicantshasalreadybeen settlednowtherj isnoroasontokeep pendingthisSA. |
||
| ThereforeSAisdismissedforwanto prosecution. Recordbeconsigned totherecord room. (Ra s Patel) PresidingOfficer DRT:JABALPUR (M.P.&C.G.) |
Applicant
Respondent
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
