Single judge disposed of a writ petition where the applicant remained absent despite a peremptory order. The application was dismissed for want of prosecution and the record consigned to the record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA553/24 12t09t24 |
NonefortheApplicant ShriShreyasDubey,Advforthe Respondent |
|
| Perusaloforderdated09/08/24itreveals thatonlastdateofhearingalsonoone had appearedeventhenmatterhasbeen adjournedwithperemptoryorder. |
||
| Sincetoday also Applicant sideremain absentlookingtoperemptoryorderdated 09108124nowthisSA beingdismissedfor wantofprosecution. |
||
| Recordbeconsignedtothe record room. | ||
| S Patel) Pres lngOfficer DRT:JABALPUR (M.P.&C.G.) |
Applicant
Respondent
S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
