facilities of Rs.30,00,000/- and that the 2nd defendant and Prameela C.M. stood guarantors to the said credit facilities and that mortgage created over the S.A. schedule properties has been extended to the credit facilities availed by the 2nd applicant and that security interest has been registered with the CERSAI as per Annexure-B4 and that Possession Notice was issued to the applicants and the guarantors and that it was affixed on the secured assets and that it was published in newspapers and that SARFAESI proceedings were not initiated against the credit facilities availed by the partnership firm M/s. Beaumonde Furniture and that for abundant caution the credit facilities availed by the above said partnership firm is mentioned in Annexure-A3 Demand Notice and Annexure-A4 Possession Notice and that for the representation, Annexure-A5 submitted by the 2nd applicant, reply dated 27.10.2022, Annexure-B9 was sent to the 2nd applicant and that the 2nd applicant did not make any request for moratorium with required documents and that interest is charged only as per the agreed terms and that the requirements mandated under Sec.14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 were complied with by the defendants and that the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Kozhikode, after having perused the documents and contents of the affidavit and having satisfied over the same passed order appointing Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the secured asset and that there is no illegality or irregularity in the measures initiated by the defendants and that therefore S.A may be dismissed with cost to the defendants.
