Disposed
Smt Kirti Bala Solanki v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/523/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
PAGE No.
¶2
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶3
CASE No.......
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA 573122 05/08/24 |
Appticantsby Shri AkshatAgrawat, Advocate NonepresentfortheResPondents |
|
| AppticantshavefiLedanappticationon27107/24 seekingwithdrawatof thepresent5Asupportedwith theaffidavitofSmt.KirtiBata SotankiAppticantNo.-1 and ShriSwarnimSotankitegalheirofdeceased AppticantNo.-2.ltisstatedthat thepresent SecuritisationAppticationhasbeenfiLed assaitingthe actioninitiatedbytheApplicant-Bankagainstthe AppticantsundertheprovisionsofSecuritisation Act. lLis furtherstatedthatduringthependencyofthe presentSAa settlementhasbeenarrivedatbetween theAppticants andtheRespondentNo'-8interms of compromisedeed dated01106124. TheCounselfor Appticantssubmittedthatinvjewofthecompromise arrivedatbetweenthePartiestheAppticantsarenot desirousofprosecutingthepresentSAandpraysfor withdrawing thesame. Inviewofthefactsand circumstancesof thematter andconsideringtheapplication supportedbythe affidavitoftheApplicants,thepresentSAstands disposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbeconsignedto therecordroom. (Ram was Pate[) Presidingofficer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Applicants
- respondent
Respondent-8
Coram
AI extract
Ram Pate
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court