The applicant, a tenant and 3rd party to the loan, challenged eviction orders under the Sale Proceedings Act. The single judge relied on Hemraj Ratnakar Salian to hold the petition maintainable but allowed an emergent stay petition.
EA allowed; possession deferred to 15.09.2024 pending tender of an undertaking to quit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SA No. 466 of 2024
25.07.2024
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 25th day of July, 2024
Present: SHRI A. S. JAYACHANDRA
Presiding Officer (In – charge)
SARFAESI APPLICATION No.466 of 2024
Sri Murali Krishna & Co. Rep by its Partner, Shri. Ratanshi. M. Patel, S/o. Late Manji Premji Patel, No.20, Ranganathan Avenue, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.
….Applicant
-Vs-
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s. R. Kannan
PROCEEDINGS DATED 25.07.2024
IA/1318/2024 [Emergent Petition]
Heard and the same is allowed.
IA/1318/2024 [Stay Petition]
Heard the Ld. counsel.
SA No. 466 of 2024
2
25.07.2024
Sd/(A.S. JAYACHANDRA) PRESIDING OFFICER (In-charge)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a tenant of the borrower can challenge the impugned order despite the ruling in Hemraj Ratnakar Salian Vs. HDFC Bank Ltd.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hemraj Ratnakar Salian Vs. HDFC Bank Ltd. and OrsExplained¶26
Hemraj Ratnakar Salian Vs. HDFC Bank Ltd., and, Ors, reported in 2021 SCC online SC 611 · Who else cites this
Sri Murali Krishna & Co.
The Authorized Officer, M/s. Punjab National Bank
Sri Krishna Saw Mill
A. S. Jayachandra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
