Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chandigarh dismissed an application for settlement under an Order to be Settled (OTS) as it was withdrawn by the applicant following a settlement between the parties.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/41/2024 BROAD WEIGH INDIA Vs PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
12.04.2024 Item No.62
Present: Sh.Sunil Salhotra, proxy for Sh.Atul Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant.
Ms.Neha Arora, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Salhotra, states that there has been an OTS between the parties and he does not want to pursue present SA. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as
withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Broad Weigh India
Punjab and Sind Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
