Dismissed
Amarjit singh v. Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited
DRTSA/385/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application dismissed in default as the applicant failed to appear on the hearing date.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/385/2023 AMARJIT SINGH Vs TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED 24.09.2024 Item No.11
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Mohd. Arham, Counsel for respondent FI.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Amarjit Singh
Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court