Application dismissed in default for non-prosecution as neither party appeared before the Tribunal despite repeated calls, with no one representing the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl379l2022
SH RA,INDER SINGH Vs PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LTD
23.09.2024
Item no. 31
Present: None.
Matter is taken through video conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. counsel for both the parties are not appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present sA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
,,a\ (susHrl rumAn RASToGT) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
SH RA, INDER SINGH
PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LTD
SUSHIL RANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
