This order records that an Ombudsman Reference (OTS) exists between the applicant and Canara Bank. The Sanctioned Amount (SA) suit was disposed of based on the cited OTS, with remaining payments scheduled for January 2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/377/2023 MS HANU TRADERS Vs CANARA BANK
11.12.2024 Item No.29
Present: Sh. Satyam Shardha, proxy Counsel for Sh. Viren Sibal, Counsel for the Applicant (on VC). Sh. Rahul Yadav, Authorized Officer/Canara Bank (on VC).
Counsel for the applicant states that there has been OTS between the parties. Applicant has paid some money and the remaining payment would made in January, 2025. In view of the OTS, SA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
MS Hanu Traders
Canara Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
