Vipin Kumar Hazri v. Uco Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/376/2023 VIPIN KUMAR HAZRI Vs UCO BANK
12.04.2024 Item No.59
Present: Sh. Sachin Rana, proxy for Sh.GS Salana, Counsel for the Applicant.
Sh.Vivek Verma, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr.Verma states that the account has been settled and bank has also issued NOC to the applicant. Accordingly, the present SA stands disposed of. File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
VIPIN KUMAR HAZRI
- respondent
UCO BANK
Coram
(A S Narang)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court