Sri Jhantu Sarkar v. Uco Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order Sheet
| Case No. SA 365 of 2023 |
SRI JHANTU SARKAR –VS- UCO BANK SARKAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Dat e of the Ord er |
Order with Signature | O f f i c e a c t i o n w i t h d a t e a n d d a t e d S i g n a t u r e o f P a r t i e s w h e n n e c e s s a r y |
2
1 5 . 3 . 2 Mr. S.N. Patra Bhatta, 024 Ms. Sucharita Sil. ( S l . … For the Respondent Bank. N o . 17) None appears for the sarfaesi applicant. Learned counsel for the respondent bank appears and submits that the previous SA was disposed of as infructuous by order dated 16.6.2023. Learned counsel further submits that on the same cause of action, the applicant has filed this SA challenging sale notice dated 19.10.2023 and publication of sale notice dated 19.10.2023.
Learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that no sale took place on the sale notice dated 19.10.2023. Hence the sale notice dated 19.10.2023 which was scheduled to be held on 23.11.2023 becomes infructuous.
The sarfaesi applicant is not present.
As per submission of the learned counsel for the
3
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sri Jhantu Sarkar
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Ambuja Mohan Das
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court