The Applicant sought to withdraw a Securitisation Application (No.356/2022) citing an amicable settlement. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal via video conferencing, disposing of the application and pending interlocutory matters.
Securitisation Application and all pending interlocutory applications disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 24 Sr |
.04.202 . No.34 |
4 SA No.356/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
I |
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.356/2022 Atharav Hospital ..Applicant Versus Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited ..Respondent/s Mr. Umesh Bhadgaonkar – Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Suresh W. Munde - Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through Hybrid. |
||
| 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter is settled between the parties amicably and as such the applicant seeks to withdraw the Securitisation Application. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.356/2022 stands disposed off as withdrawn. B. Accordingly all the pending interlocutory applications stand disposed off. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.356/2022) Page 1 of 1
Atharav Hospital
Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
